Legal Opinion

(PS) Ghafoori v. Pettus

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 30, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02930Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RADNI GHAFOORI, No. 2:24-cv-2930 DC AC PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 DEPUTY LELAND PETTUS, LIEUTENANT KIELY BRANDON, 15 DEPUTY GEORGE CROWLEY, JUDGE LINDA A. McFADDEN, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was accordingly referred to the 20 undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). This case was initially filed in the Fresno Division of the 21 Eastern District of California, and plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API