Brittenham v. Robinson
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Wells Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
— The appellees, by their verified motion filed on the 25th of February, 1898, sought the correction of a judgment which they had recovered on the 2nd day of 11 arch, 1896, in the court below, against the appellant, in an action of replevin wherein the appellees were the plaintiffs and the appellant was the defendant. At the hearing the *537court sustained the motion, and ordered the entry nunc pro tunc of the judgment corrected as asked in the motion.
On this appeal the record of the proceeding for the correction of the judgment is brought before us. The judgment was originally entered as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gundy v. CarriganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LammIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Neuenschwander v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
- Reitzel v. CampbellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
- Byerly, d/b/a Byerly Construction Co. v. LusardiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962