Legal Opinion

People v. Maldonado

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Victor M. Ort, J.

In People v Homero (172 Misc 2d 99) this court held that two prior misdemeanor convictions for driving while intoxicated (DWI) were sufficient to constitute a lawful predicate for a charge of driving while intoxicated as a class D felony. The motion before this court once again calls into question the Legislature’s intent when it recently enacted chapter 652 of the Laws of 1996 in relation to escalating the penalty for driving while intoxicated to a class D felony. Having waived indictment, defendant is charged by superior court information with the crime…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. MorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. FinneganNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. McCrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. People v. FieldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. DaggettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. LutherEast Rochester Justice Court · 2013
  3. DAGGETT, RONALD C., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API