Pentecost v. Anchor Wire Corp.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, Justice.
The question presented in this workers’ compensation appeal is whether the trial court erred in sua sponte dismissing the Plaintiff’s suit during the course of the Defendant’s proof without allowing rebuttal of that proof by Plaintiff. We are of the opinion that the action by the trial court was error, and we therefore reverse and remand this cause for a new trial.
The Plaintiff-Appellant, Mrs. Helen Pentecost, began working for Defendant-Ap-pellee, Anchor Wire Corporation, in 1978. She worked at an electric fence machine transferring various lengths of different gauge…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fisher v. Travelers' Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Harris v. Baptist Memorial HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- Cortrim Manufacturing Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
3Cited by6 opinions
- Banks v. St. Francis HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
- Pentecost v. Anchor Wire Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985
- Carolyn Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019
- Gwendolyn Jackson v. Zodie HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
- Kirk, Regina v. Amazon.com, Inc.Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.