Legal Opinion

Gallagher, Magner & Solomento, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1969No. Appeal, No. 864PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

This action in assumpsit was tried before a judge and jury. A verdict of $2,300 plus interest was returned in favor of appellee. Appellant’s motion for judgment n.o.v. was denied, whereupon this appeal followed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to appellee, the facts established at trial are as follows:

Appellee is an insurance brokerage firm whose client, P. Agnes, Inc. (hereinafter “Agnes”), a construction company, was insured by appellant, Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. (hereinafter “Aetna”). Coverage was for “all sums which the Insured shall become…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tugboat Indian Co. v. A/S Ivarans RederiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Lohr's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Gaul v. McLAUGHLINSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Aresto v. MilieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Advance Realty Co. v. McLeodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hill v. Cross Country Settlement, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Bednar v. BednarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Pennsylvania Securities Commission v. Reliance Development Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. AMERICAN ZINC RECYCLING CORP. v. TOPCOR AUGUSTA, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Com. Ex Rel. Pa., Etc. v. Reliance Dev.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API