Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Valjean

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 15, 1935No. 5311PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODWARD, District Judge.

This is. an appeal from the final decree of the District Court holding that Valjean patent, No. 1,512,869,' for improvements in combustion apparatus, was valid and infringed by appellant as to claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9.

The defenses were invalidity- and non-infringement.

Appellee Motor Wheel Corporation is an exclusive, licensee under the patent in suit and manufactures and sells oil burners for' space heating. The alleged infringing burner is manufactured by the Wehrle Company of Newark, Ohio, and is sold by appellant. The patent related to a liquid fuel burner…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Janesville Hay Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Adam v. FolgerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
  3. Libbey Glass Mfg. Co. v. Albert Pick Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  2. Valjean v. Perfection Stove Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  3. Ladenson v. Overspred Stoker Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API