Legal Opinion

Unger v. Herscovitz

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 14, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGenung, J.

Plaintiff sued to recover $50 for medical services rendered to the defendants. Defendants counterclaimed for $5,000 for malpractice. The action was never noticed for trial. The defendants moved to dismiss the action, pursuant to section 126 of the Municipal Court Code. On the argument of this motion a *754stipulation was entered into between the parties as follows: “ It is hereby agreed that this motion, including the counterclaim, be dismissed.”

On January 7, 1929, a judgment for costs in the sum of thirty-seven dollars and fifty cents was entered against the defendants, based on the dismissal of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kohlberg v. HalloranCity of New York Municipal Court · 1928
  2. Rosebrock Butter & Egg Co. v. JorischAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Warsaw v. VoitCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API