Legal Opinion

Rosebrock Butter & Egg Co. v. Jorisch

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 10, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District. Action by Rosebrock Butter & Egg Company, Incorporated, against Frieda Jorisch and Abe Schneiderman. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, gs modified by an order reviewing the clerk’s taxation of costs, defendant Schneiderman appeals. Order reversed, and judgment for defendant for costs reinstated.

1Per curiam

Judgment was entered in favor of defendant Schneiderman for costs. After the original taxation of costs by the clerk, an order to show cause was served on this defendant why the judgment for costs in favor of defendants and against the plaintiff should not be set aside and vacated and the plaintiff should not have a new trial. Thereafter, and 19 days after the clerk’s taxation, the court which passed upon this order signed an order which denied the motion in so far as it was for a new trial, but which ordered that the taxation of costs by the clerk taxing $15 in favor of this defendant “be…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Unger v. HerscovitzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1929
  2. Harwitz v. CohenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1930
  3. M. & S. Electric Co. v. MoskowitzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API