State Ex Rel. S. Monroe & Son Co. v. Tracy
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
In order to intelligently pass on the demurrer herein, the petition, excepting therefrom the exhibits “A,” “B,” “C,” “D,” “E,” “F,” and “G-,” attached to the petition, and the answer, have been fully set out herein. Four of the exhibits are photostatic copies of the final and supplemental estimates on the two proposals that constituted the basis of the contract. These estimates portray the real bone of contention in this action, but because of their volume they are not set out and when necessary they will be referred to by their letter designation.
The controversy grows out of Highway Project…
2Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Doria v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Harrison Construction Co. v. Ohio Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- State ex rel. Krabach v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Morgan v. CanaryOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
- Harrison Construction Company v. Ohio Turnpike Commission, Harrison Construction Company, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee v. Ohio Turnpike Commission, Defendant-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963