Legal Opinion
North Jersey St. Ry. Co. v. Brill
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 3, 1905No. 31PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.
1Opinion of the Court
ACHESON, Circuit Judge.
This suit was brought for the alleged infringement of two letters patent, No. 627,898 and No. 627,900, both granted on June 27, 1899, to George M. Brill, who assigned them to the complainant. The latter of the two patents is divisional in its relation, to the former. The original application was filed July 3, 1897, and the divisional application November 9, 1897. Both patents relate to improvements “in car trucks generally,” but “especially to trucks employed in passenger service in connection with electric propulsion.” The specification of patent No. 627,898 describes…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Office Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Fenton Metallic Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Stimpson v. WoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brill v. Washington Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Brill v. Peckham Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905