Legal Opinion

United States v. Prescott

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1979No. Crim. A. 79-147PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SNYDER, District Judge.

Defendant Isaac Prescott, charged with bank robbery at the First National Bank of Mercer County, Farrell, Pennsylvania, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a) and (b), has filed pretrial motions seeking to suppress a statement and physical evidence illegally obtained, a motion to conduct a lineup and a blank lineup, and a motion to suppress eyewitness testimony on the grounds that photographic displays were unduly suggestive. After due consideration of the testimony presented, and after argument by counsel, the motion to suppress certain physical evidence will be…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clemons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. RushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  4. Williams v. TanseyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Foster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API