Legal Opinion

State v. C.Q.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 28, 1999No. 42252-9-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

A starter’s pistol having no bore through its barrel, and thus capable of discharging only blank cartridges, is not a firearm nor is it a dangerous weapon as that term is defined by the Legislature. The definitional statute in question, RCW 9.41.280, lists a variety of weapons of a kind capable of producing death or serious bodily injury. While we recognize that a starter’s pistol is capable of producing the fear of such injury in any person not aware of its true nature, fear of injury is not a term the Legislature chose to use in the definition. Thus, taking one to school may and should be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. MylesWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. TriceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. J.R.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  2. State v. CQCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  3. State v. JRCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API