State v. C.Q.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
A starter’s pistol having no bore through its barrel, and thus capable of discharging only blank cartridges, is not a firearm nor is it a dangerous weapon as that term is defined by the Legislature. The definitional statute in question, RCW 9.41.280, lists a variety of weapons of a kind capable of producing death or serious bodily injury. While we recognize that a starter’s pistol is capable of producing the fear of such injury in any person not aware of its true nature, fear of injury is not a term the Legislature chose to use in the definition. Thus, taking one to school may and should be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. MylesWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. TriceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. J.R.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. CQCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- State v. JRCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005