Legal Opinion

State v. CQ

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 28, 1999No. 42252-9-IPublished

1Opinion of the Court

979 P.2d 473 (1999)

96 Wash.App. 273

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

[C.Q.], B.D. 10-06-79, Appellant.[1]

No. 42252-9-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

June 28, 1999.

David B. Koch, Nielsen Broman & Associates, Seattle, for Appellant.

Ellen O'Neill-Stephens, King County Prosecuting Attys. Office, Juvenile Section, for Respondent.

GROSSE, J.

A starter's pistol having no bore through its barrel, and thus capable only of discharging blank cartridges, is not a firearm nor is it a dangerous weapon as that term is defined by the Legislature. The definitional statute in question, RCW 9.41.280,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. MylesWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. TriceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API