Legal Opinion
Sterling Savings Bank v. JHM Properties, LLC
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 7, 2010No. 3:09-mj-00452PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BROWN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (# 54) on February 17, 2010, in which he recommends the Court grant Plaintiffs Motion (# 30) for Summary Judgment. Defendants filed timely Objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge’s report. 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nettleton v. Exact Sciences CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022
- ZAPS Technologies LLC v. KlinkhammerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024