Boyd v. Crosby Lumber & Manufacturing Co.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1DissentPatterson, J.
I am sympathetic to the result reached by the decision of the majority, however, I dissent from it for the reason I fear it invades the realm of the Legislature. It is the duty of the Court to reach a just decision from the facts before it and the present applicable law. It is the duty of the Legislature to proclaim the policies and new laws of the State. I submit the following *449opinion which I humbly believe to be in accord with our previous decisions and the law of this State.
This is a workmen’s compensation case in which the sole question for decision is whether J. E. Durham was an employee…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Sones v. Southern Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1952
- Carr v. CRABTREEMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Jackson v. WallaceMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
- Crosby Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. DurhamMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
- L. B. Priester & Son, Inc. v. Dependents of BynumMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.