Legal Opinion

Peeler v. Luther

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1940PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice. Chambliss

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This suit is in the name of the State on relation of Thurman Luther, Chairman of the Hickman County Highway Commission, who sues as such Commissioner and as a citizen, resident and taxpayer of Hickman County, for the use and benefit of the County of Hickman, seeking to recover from the defendants the sum of $2,944.49', alleging that while the defendant Peeler was Chairman of the Hickman Connty Highway Commission and while the defendant Rial was a Justice of the Peace and a member of the Quarterly Connty Conrt of said Connty, they,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Northern Trust Co. v. SnyderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Land, Log & Lumber Co. v. McIntyreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Detroit v. DeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Franey v. WarnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bob Fannon, Individually and as a City Councilman for the City of LaFollette v. City of LaFollotteTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Bayless v. Knox CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Patterson v. Anderson Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
  4. Range v. Tennessee Burley Tobacco Growers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
  5. Akin v. MacKieTennessee Supreme Court · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API