Legal Opinion
Grimes v. Housing Authority
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 23, 1996No. 14894PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiffs’ claims were barred by General Statutes § 52-584, the applicable statute of limitations. The plaintiffs argued in response *325that a related class action tolled the statute of limitations pursuant to the rule of American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538, 94 S. Ct. 756, 38 L. Ed. 2d 713 (1973). The dispositive issue of this appeal is whether the trial court improperly determined that, even if we…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grimes v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Straw Pond Associates, LLC v. Fitzpatrick, Mariano & Santos, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Timberland Development Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Grimes v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Grimes v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.