Legal Opinion
Timberland Development Corp. v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 26, 1996No. 15195PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendants’1 motion for summary judgment.2 The complaint was brought in three counts, the first for tortious interference with economic relations, the second for breach of a duty of care, and the third pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.3 The plaintiff sought compensatory damages, and, additionally, in the third count, punitive damages. We affirm the trial court’s granting of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to the first two counts; we reverse the judgment as to the third count.
The following facts and procedural…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zichichi v. Middlesex Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Bogue v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Gaynor v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- City of West Haven v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Thorne v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Krondes v. Norwalk Savings SocietyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Danbury Limited Part. v. P. Z. Comm'n, No. Cv97 0157914 S (Jan. 22, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Timberland Dev. Corp. v. East Haven P. Z., No. Cv 90297525s (May 9, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Timberland Development Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Weyel v. Catania, No. Cv94 0361996s (Jul. 17, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997