People v. Daniels
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
In this case we hold that when the defendant forced his victim to go from a public area to a less frequented nearby location, robbed him, and, upon discovering the victim possessed a bank card, required him to accompany defendant to a bank to withdraw cash from an automated teller machine, the defendant was properly convicted of kidnapping 1 for robbery. Although scholarly opinion has been consistent in answering the question of what conduct constitutes kidnapping for robbery as opposed to robbery alone, judicial application of the rule has varied considerably as courts…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. BeamonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. LykkenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. La FranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- People v. ChaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.