People v. Schoeneth
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Recorder’s Court of Detroit. Information for breaking and entering a store, etc. Respondent was convicted below.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
This case comes up on exceptions before judgment. Without conceding that the points suggested by *490the defense are legitimately raised, they will be disposed of briefly.
The prisoner was charged by information in the Hecorder’s Court of the city of Detroit with having in the night-time broken and entered a store in that city, not adjoining to or occupied with a dwelling-house, with intent to steal goods and chattels therein, and with having then and ¿there feloniously stolen, taken and carried away, the same of the value of $7.50.
He pleaded not guilty and being put on his trial before a jury,…
2Cited by8 opinions
- People v. VelingMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. CareyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. PlineMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1884
- People v. ReidMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.