People v. Pline
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Ionia. (Smith, J.j Respondent was convicted of larceny. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
The respondent was prosecuted before a justice of the peace, in the county of Ionia, for stealing a horse-blanket of the value of three 'dollars.
Upon the trial the jury disagreed, and were discharged, and the canse was continued until the fifteenth of December, 18S5, at which time the prosecuting attorney nolle prosequied the case.
On the same day, and after the discharge of the defendant, *250a new complaint was made, and warrant issued by the same justice, charging the respondent with the same offense; and, on being arrested and taken before the justice, he pleaded the first proceedings against…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- People v. WebbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- People v. HensslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- People v. GreenNew York Supreme Court · 1834
- People v. SchoenethMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. CharlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- State v. LarimoreIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- State v. CourtneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
- Gaffney v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.