Legal Opinion
Arthur v. Starrett City Associates
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 22, 1983No. 79 CV 3096 (ERN)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEAHER, District Judge.
Starrett City, located on a 153-acre site in Brooklyn, New York, is a private, middle income housing project. Providing 5,581 apartments to approximately 17,000 tenants, the project benefits from State and federal financing subsidies. Starrett City apparently maintains a racial balance in its tenant population by allocating approximately seventy per cent of its available vacancies to majority member, or white, applicants, and the remaining vacancies to minority member applicants. The seven current plaintiffs claim to be middle income blacks who have…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Norwalk Core v. Norwalk Redevelopment AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Lloyd T. Griffin v. Robert F. Burns, Etc., Thomas A. McCormickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Robidoux v. CelaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Robidoux v. CelaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Colombrito v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- McNeill v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Colombrito v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.