Legal Opinion

Raffold Process Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 11, 1946No. 4066PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODBURY, Circuit Judge.

These consolidated petitions for review of two decisions of the Tax Court of the United States raise the question of the de-ductibility from income, personal holding company, and declared value excess profits taxes of advances made by the two petitioning corporations to a third under the following circumstances.

Harold R. Rafton, formerly the owner of a chemical laboratory specializing in problems arising from the use of carbonate fillers in paper, and also the owner of a number of domestic and foreign (European and Canadian) patents covering processes for the use of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Trust Under the Will of Bingham v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Boehm v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Commissioner v. Scottish American Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Portland Mfg. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  2. Loewi & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  3. Black v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
  4. Kohn v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  5. Henry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API