Legal Opinion
Bernas v. Cablevision System Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 30, 2007No. 06-0250-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-appellant Kelly E. Bernas (“Bernas”) appeals from the December 19, 2005 judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Spatt, J.) granting the defendant-appellee Cablevision Service Corporation’s (“CSC”) motion to dismiss the amended complaint.
We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review. We review de novo the grant of a motion to dismiss, accepting the complaint’s allegations as true. See Tindall v. Poultney High School Dist, 414 F.3d 281, 283 (2d Cir.2005).…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jackson Leeds v. Jonathan S. Meltz, Anthony Mansfield, Susan Ferraro, Merrick T. Rossein, Unknown John and Jane DoesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Teresa Zerilli-Edelglass v. New York City Transit Authority and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Marie Powell v. National Board of Medical Examiners, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Bruce M. KoeppenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cotz v. MastroeniDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Rigano v. County of SullivanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- KITCHENS v. UNITED STATES MEDICAL LICENSING EXAMINATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- KITCHENS v. UNITED STATES MEDICAL LICENSING EXAMINATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023