Legal Opinion
State v. McReynolds
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 5, 2008No. 24741-4-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 — Jesse McReynolds was charged with one count of luring a child. RCW 9A.40.090. The superior court dismissed the case after the State presented its case *944in chief. The trial court entered an order stating that the dismissal was tantamount to a Knapstad1 order. The State appeals the dismissal of the case. Mr. McReynolds cross-appeals the characterization of the dismissal as a Knapstad order. We conclude that the dismissal was appropriate and tantamount to an acquittal. We therefore affirm in part and reverse in part.
Schultheis, J.
*944¶2 At about 5:30 pm on September 1, 2005, 11-year-old L.S. was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. KnapstadWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HomanWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. HomanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. Castillo-MurciaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington, V Arnold Briones FloresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington, V Edwin Lizarraga CancheCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.