Louis Dreyfus Citrus Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACH, Judge.
I
Introduction
This case comes before the court on a Motion for Judgment Upon the Agency Record pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.2 brought by Louis Dreyfus Citrus Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “Louis Dreyfus”). Plaintiff claims it has suffered injury in fact from an order imposing antidumping duties (“AD”) on frozen concentrated orange juice for further manufacture (“FCOJM”) produced and exported by Plaintiff. Complaint ¶ 7; Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Orange Juice from Brazil, 71 Fed.Reg. 12,183 (March 9, 2006) (“AD Order"). Plaintiff challenges, inter alia, (1) the authority of the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Murray v. Schooner Charming BetsySupreme Court of the United States · 1804
- Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
- Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016