People v. Torres
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We find no merit to defendant’s argument that the trial court permitted testimony that improperly bolstered the complainant’s testimony. The complainant testified to certain statements she made to Sheriff's deputies upon their arrival at the scene of the rape. The only objection raised was that the statements were hearsay. We conclude *636that those statements were admissible as evidence of a prompt complaint of rape (see, Baccio v People, 41 NY 265) or as an excited utterance or spontaneous declaration (see, People v Acomb, 87 AD2d 1, 9, lv dismissed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. MarksNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- People v. CavinessNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. . Del VermoNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. GreavesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. VigliottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. RandallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. SpencerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.