Legal Opinion

In Re Amos

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 29, 1981No. 281PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

Appellant, a juvenile, was adjudicated delinquent1 after the court below found that he had committed acts constitut*448ing criminal attempt2 and conspiracy.3 The evidence, however, is insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt4 appellant’s commission of any delinquent acts,5 and we reverse.

Several hours prior to the incident on which this case is founded, police officers on routine patrol saw appellant standing in an alley (which was a public thoroughfare). The next time they passed the alley, appellant was gone. Some time after this sighting, they received a report of the theft…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. HolguinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. HorneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ManchasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. StoresSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. In the Interest of ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. PaschallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API