Legal Opinion

Burrows v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 18, 1929No. A-6556PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Oklahoma county of the offense of maintaining a public nuisance by keeping a place at 15 West Third Street, Oklahoma City, where intoxicating liquors were kept, sold, bartered, and given away, and where persons were permitted to congregate for the purpose of buying and receiving intoxicating liquors, and her punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The first error complained of by the defendant is that the court erred in admitting incompetent testimony…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dave v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  2. Price Peck v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Cole v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  4. Craig v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Whitenack v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Wise v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Jeffries v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API