Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 10, 1929No. A-6703Published

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Okmulgee county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $150 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 60 days.

Defendant complains, first, that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict of the jury. This court has many times said that it will not grant a new trial on the ground of insufficient evidence, where there is any competent evidence in the record to support the verdict, if the jury believed the testimony offered…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Halsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Burrows v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Guerin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API