Legal Opinion
United McGill Corp. v. Stinnett
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 16, 1996No. Civil AW-96-1402PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Presently pending before the Court for consideration is Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant has filed a Response. Additionally, the Court held a hearing in this matter on December 10, 1996. After considering the entire file and listening carefully to oral arguments presented at the hearing, the Court finds that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted but modified in accordance with this opinion.
Refund to us for Overpayment of Benefits
If you or your dependent recover money for medical ... expenses incurred due to an ...…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tommy Land, Cross-Appellee v. Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers and Warehouse Workers Union (Independent) Health and Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Dugan v. NicklaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harris v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- PRC, Inc. v. O'BryanFairfax County Circuit Court · 1998