Legal Opinion

Woodard v. Huenefeld

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1964No. 35572Published

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

James M. Woodard and Mabel Woodard, his wife, plaintiffs, brought this action against Charles A. Huenefeld and Monetha N. Huenefeld, his wife, defendants. The purpose of the action was to enjoin the defendants in constructing and maintaining a dike or fill across a natural drainageway from the plaintiffs’ land to the defendants’ land. The trial court found that the general drainage of surface waters from the lands of plaintiffs, described as the east half of the northeast quarter of Section 26, Township 10 North, Range 7 West of the 6th P. M., in Hamilton County, is from the approximate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mader v. MettenbrinkNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Schomberg v. KutherNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  3. McGill v. Card-Adams Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Town of Everett, Burt County v. TeigelerNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Ross v. RossNebraska Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API