Legal Opinion

Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1968No. Appeal, No. 32PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

With the advent of mechanical devices for controlling the movement of more than one train on a single track, many railroads in Pennsylvania have abandoned the old system of flagging, whereby a man was dispatched to the rear of a halted train to place flares and wave flags, thus insuring against rear end collisions. The abandoning of the flaggers forms the basis of this controversy.

On July 22, 1964, a union filed a complaint before the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission against the Pittsburgh and Lake Erie R. R. Co., alleging that the railroad had amended its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. WESTON v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Baltimore & OR Co. v. CMWLTH., D. OF L. & I.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Allegheny Airlines, Inc. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API