Legal Opinion

Simpson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 24, 1926No. 1847PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, District Judge.

This action was brought to recover damages from the defendant as surety on an attachment undertaking given in another action heretofore brought in this court. Plaintiffs here (defendants in the attachment suit) moved to dissolve the attachment under which a levy had been made, on the ground that plaintiff was not entitled thereto. The motion was granted. *390The time included between the levying of the attachment and the dissolving thereof under the court’s order was two days. The property attached consisted of money, amounting to the sum of $7,988.56.

Without reviewing the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tullock v. MulvaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Elder v. KutnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. L. Bucki & Son Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Java Cocoanut Oil Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dorsey v. ParamoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API