Legal Opinion

Hathaway v. Michigan Central R. R.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1883PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to Jackson. (Gridley, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. Employers are bound to explain to servants the dangers of using machinery which they do not understand: Strahlendorf v. Rosenthal 30 Wis. 675; McGowan v. La Plata Mining Go. 9 Eed. Rep. 861; Grizzle v. Frost 3 F. & F. 622 ; St Loids (& S. E. Ry. Go. v. Yalirius 56 Ind. 511; Howling v. Girard D. Allen Go. 14 Gent.

Read the full summary

Error to Jackson. (Gridley, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. Employers are bound to explain to servants the dangers of using machinery which they do not understand: Strahlendorf v. Rosenthal 30 Wis. 675; McGowan v. La Plata Mining Go. 9 Eed. Rep. 861; Grizzle v. Frost 3 F. & F. 622 ; St Loids (& S. E. Ry. Go. v. Yalirius 56 Ind. 511; Howling v. Girard D. Allen Go. 14 Gent. L. J. 92; Goombs v. New Bedford Go. 102 Mass. 597; O’Oonnor v. Adams 120 Mass. 427; Oooley on Torts 553; "Wood’s M. & S. § 349; Pcm'h-hurst v. Johnson 50 Mich. 70; the construction of the machinery is not sufficient to…

1Opinion of the CourtSheewood, J.

Tlie plaintiff brings bis suit against the Michigan Central Railroad Company for damages sustained by him while in the company’s employment as a brakeman, alleging that while making a coupling of cars at Niles, as directed by the company’s agent, his arm was caught between ■the bumpers and crushed in such manner as to render amputation necessary; and that the injury was caused by the negligence of the company in not informing the plaintiff of the dangerous position he was called upon to occupy, ■and the nature, character and action of the machinery used for the coupling, and the particular…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Davis v. Detroit & Milwaukee Rail RoadMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Mad River & Lake Erie Railroad v. BarberOhio Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Michigan, Central Railroad v. ColemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Swoboda v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Smith v. Peninsular Car WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Nadau v. White River Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Alcorn v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Mynning v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Russell v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API