Legal Opinion

Smedley v. Holt

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1975No. 2252PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Justice.

The court is required on this appeal to decide whether the documents submitted by the State of California adequately support that state’s request for the extradition of appellee Holt.

In 1958, Holt was charged in California with four counts of second degree burglary stemming from transgressions involving four separate telephone booths. According to the record before us, he has either been awaiting disposition of the charge, on probation, in jail or on parole for all of the intervening 17 years, although there is no indication in the record that he has during that…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. WingoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McCullough v. DarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Miller v. CroninSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  3. In re LambertSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  4. Kelly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990
  5. Lawrence v. LusterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API