Crimm v. Crimm

Appellant’s chief contentions are (1) that the amendment to the bill was without notice to respondent, and as to it there was neither answer nor decree pro eonfesso, wherefore the submission for final decree was premature and erroneous; and (2) that the decree granting a divorce to complainant was erroneous, because it appeared that a valid divorce a vinculo matri-monii was granted to him against complainant by the superior court of Fulton county, Ga., on November 29, 1920.

Under the Act of September 22, 1915 (Gen. Acts 1915, p. 705), a copy of the amendment to the bill of complaint should…