Legal Opinion

Hilton v. Ernst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Morris L. Ernst and another, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Orange on the 2d day of . June, 1898, upon the report of. a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of referee.

All concurred.

The following is the opinion of the referee:

William Vanamee, Referee :

This action is brought by the receiver of a stock corporation to compel the defendants, who are creditors of the corporation, •to account to him, for the benefit of ail the creditors, for the property of the corporation transferred to the defendants by an act of preference prohibited by the statute. Section 48 of the Stock Corporation Law (Laws of 1890, chap. 564, as amd. by Laws' of 1892, chap. 688) forbids and invalidates the transfer of any property of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dalziel v. RosenfeldNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Newman v. Meisel-Galland Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  3. Wright v. Gansevoort BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. Wright v. Gansevoort BankNew York Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Newman v. Meisel-Galland Co.New York Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API