Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Pennsylvania R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided May 9, 1881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion for New Trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Wallace, D. J.

At the close of the evidence in this case the court directed the jury to find a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff now moves for a new trial. For the purposes of the motion the plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of every controverted fact, and all disputable inferences, which the jury could have indulged in his favor. The action is for injuries received by the plaintiff in falling into an unprotected pit, located between the tracks of the defendant’s road, and used by the defendant for dumping the ashes of its engines. The pit was located upon the private grounds of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nicholson v. . the Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1870

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McConkey v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Weldon v. Philadephia, Wilmington & Baltimore RailroadSuperior Court of Delaware · 1899
  3. Smith v. DayU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1898
  4. Onderdonk v. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API