Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. Paccar, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 21, 1980No. 7337-1-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, C.J.

—The Continental Insurance Company appeals from a judgment in favor of Paccar, Inc., denying Continental's claim for additional insurance premiums from Paccar and decreeing that Paccar's self-retained aggregate limit of liability under its insurance policy with Continental should be prorated.

Paccar, Inc., is an international manufacturer of heavy duty trucks, tractors and off-highway equipment. While Paccar maintains its own insurance department, Marsh & McLennan, Inc., an insurance brokerage, worked with Paccar for the purpose of securing Paccar's insurance at all times relevant to this…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Leschi Improvement Council v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Stender v. Twin City Foods, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Finney v. Farmers Insurance Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Ross v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1964

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Denny's Restaurants, Inc. v. Security Union Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  2. Flower v. T.R.A. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. Taxter v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  4. Continental Ins. Co. v. Paccar, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Orsi v. AETNA INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API