Legal Opinion

State v. Vikhlyantsev

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 27, 1993No. 92-04174Published

1Opinion of the Court

THREADGILL, Judge.

This ease is before us for the second time on appeal. The state charged the appellee with cheating in violation of section 817.29, Florida Statutes (1991). In the first appeal, the trial court found that the cheating statute had been repealed by implication by sections 812.012 through 812.037, Florida Statutes, the Florida Anti-Fencing Act. We reversed and remanded for the appellee to be tried under section 817.29. State v. Vikhlyantsev, 602 So.2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). On remand the trial court again dismissed the charge, finding section 817.29 unconstitutionally vague.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HaganSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Powell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. State v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. State v. PetersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. State v. VikhlyantsevDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API