Legal Opinion
State v. Peterson
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 30, 1966No. 7077PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge.
We grant the petition of Appellant for Rehearing and Clarification, withdraw our opinion filed on September 16, 1966 and substitute therefore the following opinion.
The trial court quashed an information on motion of the defendant — Peterson, and the State appealed. We affirm.
The information purports to charge the defendant with uttering a forged instrument (in violation of § 831.02 F.S.A.) in that she “with intent to injure and defraud I. B. Banta, did then and there un-' *294lawfully-and feloniously utter and publish as true a certain forged and altered written…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Saunders v. KohnkeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- Biddle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
- Sapp v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
- Turnipseed v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
3Cited by5 opinions
- H. L. A. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- State v. CharlesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Darwish v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- State v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- State v. VikhlyantsevDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993