Legal Opinion

Mtr of Eighth Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litigation

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2007PublishedCited by 7 opinions

POINTS OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Pigott, J.

In this multi-defendant action, Supreme Court erred in failing to disclose to all of the parties the existence of a high-low agreement between the plaintiffs and one of the defendants. Because this error prejudiced the determination of the rights and liabilities of the nonagreeing defendant at trial, a new trial on liability and damages is warranted.

I

Plaintiff Donald H. Reynolds 1 worked at the Ashland Oil Refinery in Tonawanda, New York from 1942 through 1987, and purportedly contracted mesothelioma from his exposure to asbestos while employed at that facility.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. LahockiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. Ratterree v. BartlettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  3. Ellis v. CharnesColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Reynolds v. Amchem Products Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Monti v. WenkertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. New York State Crime Victims Board v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Mahoney v. Turner Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Doubrovinskaya v. DembitzerNew York Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Langley v. Van EatonColorado Court of Appeals · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API