Legal Opinion

Denise Braham, Karla Puckett, Devonna Hobbie, and Kimberly Lawton, individually and as representatives of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings Group Benefits Plan v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Willis Towers Watson US LLC, and John Does 1–20

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided May 15, 2026No. 1:26-cv-00455Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DENISE BRAHAM, KARLA PUCKETT, ) DEVONNA HOBBIE, and KIMBERLY ) LAWTON, individually and as representatives ) No. 25 cv 15583 of a class of participants and beneficiaries on ) behalf of the LABORATORY CORPORATION ) Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings OF AMERICA HOLDINGS GROUP ) BENEFITS PLAN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) LABORATORY CORPORATION OF ) AMERICA HOLDINGS, WILLIS TOWERS ) WATSON US LLC, and JOHN DOES 1–20, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Denise Braham, Karla Puckett, Devonna Hobbie,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Margaret E. Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. In Re: National Presto Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Jaramillo v. DineEquity, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  5. Amoco Oil Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API