Legal Opinion

Doe v. Office of Professional Medical Conduct of the New York State Department of Health

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1993PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, with *1052costs to plaintiff, in accordance with this memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed.

Plaintiff, a physician, seeks an order closing the disciplinary proceedings presently pending against him before defendant Office of Professional Medical Conduct (OPMC) pursuant to Public Health Law. The statute provides for the appointment of Committees on Professional Conduct which are to conduct "disciplinary proceedings” as prescribed in section 230 of that law (see, Public Health Law § 230 [3]-[7]). Section 230…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. John P. v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Doe v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. In re CapocciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Johnson Newspaper Corp. v. MelinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Stern v. MorgenthauNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. MATTER OF McBARNETTE v. SobolNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. North Dakota Commission on Medical Competency v. RacekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Finelli v. ChassinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Anonymous v. Bureau of Professional Medical ConductNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Dr. J.P. v. ChassinNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API