MATTER OF McBARNETTE v. Sobol
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Smith, J.
The issue here is whether the mandate of Public Health Law § 230 (11) (a) that written misconduct complaints against physicians remain confidential bars disclosure of the complaints for purposes of cross-examination where the complainants have testified against the physician in a disciplinary proceeding involving alleged sexual misconduct. Under the circumstances presented in this proceeding, where confidentiality is maintained and where the credibility of the complainants is a primary issue, we hold that the physician is entitled to the complaints in order to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hecht v. MonaghanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Simpson v. WolanskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. RamistellaNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Doe v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- In re CapocciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Moss v. ChassinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Lesesne v. BrimecomeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Gordon v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- North Dakota Commission on Medical Competency v. RacekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Ahmed Elkoulily, M.D., P.C. v. New York State Catholic Healthplan, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.