Legal Opinion

ABM Escrow Closing & Consulting, Inc. v. Matanuska Maid, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1983No. 6457PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

I. Background.

A petition for hearing was granted in this matter to consider an appellate decision of the superior court. The superior court, reversing the district court, held that ABM Escrow Closing and Consulting, Inc. (ABM), which handled the sale of an Anchorage A & W restaurant, is liable to one of the restaurant’s creditors for failing to pay that creditor’s account from the proceeds of the sale of the restaurant. The issue before us is whether Article 6 of the Uniform Commercial Code (Bulk Transfers) 1 applies, directly or by estoppel, to the sale of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Nichols v. Acers CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. De La Rosa v. Tropical Sandwiches, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Uarco, Inc. v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of St. BernardDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. B & W Glass, Inc. v. Weather Shield Mfg., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Schacht v. KunimuneAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Warren v. SouthTrust Bank, NA (In Re Warren)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1998
  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. Canyon Culvert Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Bailey v. North Sails Caribbean, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API