Legal Opinion
Ciglar v. Finkelstone
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 7, 1955PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Iítglis, C. J.
On January 26, 1954, the plaintiff filed in the Probate Court for the district of Fair-field her motion for appeal from a decree of that court dated January 18, 1954, admitting to probate the will of Joseph Ciglar. The appeal was allowed and made returnable to the Superior Court on the first Tuesday of March. In the motion the only allegations relating to the interest of the plaintiff in the decree were that she was the heir at law of the decedent and was aggrieved by the decree. Before the return day of the appeal, the defendant executor and the defendant Joseph Ciglar, Jr.,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Norton's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
- Averill v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Dickerson's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
- Sacksell v. BarrettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Weidlich v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hartford Kosher Caterers, Inc. v. GazdaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Maloney v. TaplinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Erisoty's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Williams v. HouckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Lambrakos v. CarsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.