Farris v. Hendrichs

CLEMENS, Commissioner.

Plaintiffs lost their home by a foreclosure sale, and by this action they seek to compel a reconveyance. Upon trial in the circuit court, judgment went against plaintiffs, and they appeal.

Plaintiffs and defendants “agree” that we have appellate jurisdiction. Their briefs say that this action “did not directly attack title to real property, but was rather a suit to set aside a foreclosure and for an accounting.” That statement sounds incongruous and warns us that title to real estate may be involved in a constitutional sense. If so, the Supreme Court has exclusive…