Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Henderson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1848PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR to the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J. —

Assumpsit by Thomas Henderson for the use of William Hazzard against Esther Stanton and Rachel Stanton. The declaration contains two counts. The first count is upon a note which reads as follows:—

“ On or before the 15th day of January next we promise to pay Thomas Henderson and his assigns, 625 dollars; if not paid at maturity, we agree to pay 650 dollars; which amount, when paid, will be in full for lot No. 1, in block No. 15, in Laurel, which we have this day purchased of him. “ Esther Stanton,
“ Rachel Stanton.
“ Laurel, August 27 th, 1845.”

The second count is on am indebitatus…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burrows v. YountIndiana Supreme Court · 1843
  2. Post v. ShirleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1840
  3. Starbuck v. LazenbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
  4. Tannehill v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1821

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mizen v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  2. In Re Pennsylvania Congressional Districts Reapportionment CasesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API